From My Thumb

*Some children from a loving family have been taken into care because they are obese. Why don't council social services work out a programme for such a family so that exercise and diet are controlled? Why move the kids? The problem with many social care agencies is that they are more concerned with splitting families than saving Baby P's. It is disgusting--why don't they get off their arses and start helping more abused children. An obese child in a loving environment needs parents who get onto a programme and have it monitored. You can expect this in Britain--please be careful to avoid getting your Labrador too fat---they take those away too! Sick.
* If our troops leave Afghanistan Al Quaeda moves in, say some of our political sages. So what! The Taliban are close to taking over the country again anyway.You cannot trust any Afghan anymore after the outrage this week. Let's face it we are going to have to fight terror at home, not in a country with corruption so rife that the police and army are in the Taliban's pockets. On top of that we have to fight a losing war with poor equipment. 'Big Bob', the under-equipped Defence Minister has no idea how to fight a war (He's worse than Rumsfeld who could find a WMD in his own kitchen). Bob is a defence disaster and so is his boss, Broon.
With casualties mounting (259 and counting), Broon could scrape into No. 10 again next year if he took our troops out. What a bunch of fools---AND THEY POINT FINGERS AT DANNAT!
* Here's another idiot centre stage: Alan Johnson, an ex trade union leader who doesn't like scientists who have their say. Some sort of complex I think he has. Why doesn't he leave the scientists alone and get on with his job. He's supposed to stop illegal immigrants, guard our borders and maintain a balance of cultural groups. While he's worrying about Nutt, hundreds of West Indians, Pakistanis, Ethiopians et al have sneaked in to enjoy the welfare state. How do I know, you ask? Because it has never stopped.
Here's a thought: If the country is being run by fools at every level Ed Balls should check their IQ's. He might be surprised. He could be average himself.

What sort of farce is being played out at the Hague? Karadzic refuses to appear at his trial so the trial continues without him. Many observers and witnesses want to see the "Monster" but he decides his own moves and says he needs more time. Did they do that at Nuremberg or with Saddam?

This man is a war criminal and he should be handcuffed, put in chains and dragged into the court room.

Yes, we are talking about a war criminal,a mass murderer. Not a paedophile or a dirty caller.

Are the Hague officials going soft; are they afraid of repercussions;are they too tame?

Drag the bastard into court and let him face the truth. He does not have a leg to stand on. I know the IWCT do not hang criminals but this one is definitely ready for the drop.

Am I pre-judging? I think not--the evidence came out years ago.

Much fuss tonight about Nick Griffin appearing on BBC question time. Of course all his blacksuits were in evidence as were all the thugs who "join a protest for 10 quid!"

Griffin is not a threat to British politics---he is a charlatan and bigot. He may win a few seats and council positions but his manifesto of anti-immigration is too late. He is too left wing for wise voters and may appeal to racists and anti-immigration supporters.

The problem with Griffin is that he is like a Mafia boss---he is followed by thugs, racists and people who live in the age of apartheid South Africa. Griffin thinks he's a modern day Enoch Powell but he is living in the past.

Look at the man carefully on your screen, listen to his convictions. Hear the voice carefully-----This man is as thick as 3 planks and heaven knows how he gathered a following. Thats how Mussolini did it---by the old "bullshit baffles brains" way.

Blair, as Middle East Envoy (who has done nothing for Palestinian/Israeli peace), wandered through the West Bank yesterday (suggesting no solutions, pressing the flesh as envoys do---and nodding as if he single-handedly knew a way to solve the problems of a 60 year conflict), was called a"terrorist" by an onlooker. Blair earns good money as an envoy and has grand apartments in some palace or other when he overnights in Jerusalem. He reminds me of a bath attendant who gets tips for flushing loos and mopping floors for the gentry but couldn't give a damn except for the tips.Can't fix a faulty cistern though. Blair's tips are huge.

Terrorist? What a misnomer. Tony Blair is a war criminal along with his cronies Bush and Rumsfeld. This man plotted war for no reason and being brighter than Bush, you would have thought he knew of the consequences of the aftermath.Everyone knows about the Iraq invasion but what many do not think on are the dirty reasons for starting it and the lack of preparation for phase 2---Helping the Iraquis to get their pride back by providing adequate services for electricity, water, sewage, telephones et al. As well as training an adequate police force properly.

You can argue as much as you like but these men were demolishers, not builders.

Ah well, Blair(who may become President of the EU), is in exalted company. Other presidents or leaders who were war criminals have preceded him: Charles Taylor, Kurt Waldheim, Milosevic, Goering and El Bashir of Sudan. There are many more.

The bathroom attendant is about to get a bigger bathroom. Sheesh, that's life.

Jenson Button has tried desperately to show his worth and he is a perfect example of an excellent driver who had resigned himself to a succession of crap cars and crappier teams. His excellence shone once he first settled into the seat of a brilliant car----Brawn's meticulously prepared Honda-engined car. A lot of the success must go to Ross Brawn and Honda: they provided a winning car for Button, once relegated to the back benches.

Button has a great lead on points and I doubt Abu Dhabi will change things.

I said there was a point two and that concerns Twitter. Now, what is Twitter? To me it is a lazy person's way of blogging and an outlet for thoughts that capture attention. I can just imagine Chief Twitterer, or is that Tweeter (could be Stephen Fry!), saying: "Bugger this. A blog is far too long and requires constant maintenance. Let us create a one or two sentence comment with a picture---far better and quicker than a blog--and the rich and famous, as well as the common gentry can twitter (sorry, Tweet), once or twice a day or more." Fortunately Twitter became expensive goods and now is worth millions. Our blogs: Zilch. So the Twits carried on Tweeting (even Sarah Brown), and the twittering tweets became famous.

Here's my Twitter contribution: Write a blog you lazy tweeters!

Geert Weelders is no different to many Hollanders in his country: He does not want to see it overrun by other ethnic groups. Why such a fuss should be made of him is vague. He does not want his country to be invaded by immigrants. It is as simple as that. The only reason he is bombarded by hate posters from Islamic groups is because he does not want his country to be overwhelmed by people of Islam (peaceful as they are), and other racial groups.. He has every right to reject appeals by would-be immigrants who may not be welcome in his country. Holland is a liberal country but that does not mean that every Tom, Dick and Ahmed should be allowed entry.

By the way, what gives people from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Eritrea,Iraq or Iran (amongst others),the right to demand entry into Holland ? Is there a law giving them entry? No, they're learning from easy ingress into the UK. Geert Wilders is simply trying to prevent a racial explosion in the Netherlands and the problems that accompany it.

I'm getting pissed off by the scrounging society that believes it has a right to put its tent up wherever it pleases.

Once upon a time the Scots were regarded as the nation half drunk in the morning and still drunk next morning. The Irish were not far behind.

Sure, the Scots and Irish still get out of hand now and then but I've never seen one piss on a War Memorial (Daily Mail). This disgusting behaviour is only part of a party. Young English lads and lasses can't hold their drink. They get smashed for fun and ruin their country's reputation by vomitting against walls, collapsing off pavements and seeking fights with any other skew-eyed drunk. They drink, they curse, they argue,they piss and they vomit.

The social and commercial reasons are obvious: Booze is too cheap and many youngsters have no other outlet for excitement on a Friday night. Many, unfortunately don't have much to go home to and others seek thrills, girls (Most of them stupid drunk before they reach the shag they came out for anyway), and ways of releasing pressure and stress. England is not a nation of drunks but it is becoming a nation of the wayward young: yobs, thugs and drunks out of control; girls pregnant at 17 and no answers from government on how to control this. Let's not even go into crime committed by youngsters as young as 13.

I'm not a puritan nor am I English but if no strong government is elected within the next year, the youngsters will destroy further a bad reputation built up by soccer hooligans and the like.

I could write a book ,I suppose, but comments would be more useful. If I find a guy pissing on a sacred War Memorial, I'll knock his teeth out. My father fought for a free Britain, not a nation of yobs.

This is the worst time of the year for the Royal Mail to go on strike: 8 weeks until Christmas and the cards and parcels full of Christmas cheer may not be delivered. Never mind the utility bills, statements,credit card and bank statements etc that will be undelivered.

I sympathise with the reasons for a strike but not the timing. Instead of Postie, people will resort to DHL, TNT and a myriad of others who will probably drop their prices for small items and knock the RM for a loop.

Who's the idiot who decided to bring about action at this time of the year? Sure the sorters, bulk carriers and posties will suffer from this competition in the long run! Due to stupid planning the poor postie may be without a job. And the glorious Royal Mail may stab itself in the back.

"Is that you Postie?"
"No it's DHL Madam"
"Thank God for that."

There are cleverer people in the World than I but I can tell you technology is much more advanced than ten years ago. Bye Postie.

I am thoroughly sick of reading about Electric cars in the magazines I read. Yes, I'm a car buff and I buy Autocar every week, Car Magazine every month and Evo. No wonder my favourite mag is Classic and Sportscar---no electric cars there! Autocar is the biggest culprit--why don't they form a new magazine with their profits and call it Electric Car? Plug -in electric cars are useless. Let me give you an example: The G-Whiz, a hideous Indian car, is a popular city car in London. Drive from Oxford Street to the British museum and half your miles (about 48) are used up. Hope the silly drivers can get back again!If they do they must plug in to an electricity source. Even if Boris Johnson put plugs all over London how tedious could that be? I mean 48 miles maximum--It is quite pathetic.

Electric cars are mainly powered by Lithium ion batteries (you can get them for your camera)and they have to be re-charged(just like your camera). Problem is electric cars don't take pictures and when your batteries run out you could be stranded half-way to your favourite aunty fifty miles away.

I see no immediate future for electric cars until they develop batteries that can take you down to Brighton and back without having to look at the dying volt meter.

Automobile magazine USA tested the Tesla Roadster (developed by Lotus) and managed a maximum of 189 miles on one run. True the Tesla is a sports car and has huge power developed by those batteries----but would it get you to Birmingham and back?

I'm not convinced by electric cars (remember the milkman could not travel too far in his!)and there remains a lot of work to do on battery power thus range before they can compete with hybrids (Prius et al with engine/electric motors working in tandem). That's the way to go for now.

The electric car's time will come because it is so "clean" but not for at least another 5 years. I personally expect an electric car to have a 500 to 1000 mile range--then we're talking progress!

I know that manufacturers are seeking the perfect electic car but I'm afraid most are lost. I hope they keep working at it though. A supplement to The Times showed us 10 electric cars. Their range varied from 35 miles to 200 miles for the Tesla roadster (developed in conjunction with Lotus). The Tesla costs about 100K. Seriously would you consider a car at this price offering a 200 mile range?

The G-Whiz, a car developed in India will give you 40 miles at a push. It is a top seller. Are people going mad? These stupid little cars have to be plugged into a mains charger every 40 mile run. Boris Johnson has set out to provide plug in points all over London. I'm afraid it's too early Boris. These little cars don't yet have the battery technology to provide a ride to work. Are they City cars? How far can they go in the stop-start environment like London. We are not told but hundreds of these stupid little cars are probably stranded all over the city. 40 miles is a joke!

I am tired of reading about electric cars in once-performance magazines (and there are many)---ergo there is no performance, no range and an antiquated battery system that still not can deliver. I am serious when I say that technology develops a true electric car with a range of 1000 miles. Then we're getting somewhere.

I know there are diligent people working on this problem but I want to read my favourite mags without turning every page to read about electric power technology. It is getting very boring. By the way, hybrids are an answer, a much better answer. I predict that you'll only be really happy with your electric car when it compares favourably with the abilities of a normal car--without the CO2. Wait 20 years my friends.